fagsexuality:

me as a defence attorney: [mouthing ‘girl this is bullshit’ to the judge as the prosecutor talks]

judge: [shaking her head and mouthing ‘I know baby’]

mai-chemical-romance-deactivate:

idk who needs to hear this but,,,every piece of fandom content you make should be self indulgent. you should be creating because it gives you happiness and nothing less. you aren’t a machine meant to only give to other people. the enjoyment should always come before the validation.

alexseanchai:

essektheylyss:

Actually, watching folks continue to insist that any queer relationship that isn’t explicitly and overtly romantic or sexual in media is “cowardly” is not only exhausting, but genuinely fucking infuriating.

First, queer coding is not the same as queerbaiting, and queer coding absolutely had and still has its place in all types of art, second, it’s restricting to the types of characters and stories that queer artists can create, especially queer creators who are not out, professionally or at all, and third, your conceptualization of what is queer enough is exclusionary. End of story.

explicitly, overtly, and specifically a particular sort of queer, can’t forget that part

which, one reason the word for me is “queer” is so that I don’t have to get that specific about myself, so I’m really not getting why stories should need to get that specific either

shivroy:

me when i’m happy: i deserve a little treat

me when i’m sad: fuck it i deserve a little treat

me when i’m neutral: you know what’d make this day so much better……..a lil treat

schmergo:

I especially love the part in Jane Eyre where Rochester flips through all of the weird depressing disturbing gothy drawings and paintings that Jane has in her portfolio and he’s like, “Were you… happy when you made these?” And she’s like, “I don’t understand the question.” And he basically just goes, “Need me a freak like this.” Very relatable to middle-school me.